[PATCH v2] Improve the performance of --num-threads -d 31

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Hi Minfei,

Could you help me test the patch in the attachment?

I have run it a thousand times and haven't got a failure.
Previously, I can always get a failure after running hundreds of times.

But I'm not sure if it is the same problem you have met.

-- 
Thanks
Zhou

On 02/24/2016 10:24 AM, Minfei Huang wrote:
>
>> On Feb 24, 2016, at 10:20, Zhou, Wenjian/??? <zhouwj-fnst at cn.fujitsu.com> wrote:
>>
>> Hi,
>>
>> On 02/24/2016 09:43 AM, Minfei Huang wrote:
>>> On 02/23/16 at 01:47pm, "Zhou, Wenjian/???" wrote:
>>>> Hello, Minfei,
>>>>
>>>> Does it occur every time?
>>>> If not, I think I have known the reason.
>>>
>>> Hi, Wenjian.
>>>
>>> This patch is applied directly on version 1.5.9. And makedumpfile hangs
>>> if option num-thread is appended.
>>>
>>
>> I see.
>> I'm working on it.
>>
>> BTW, did you only test it with --num-threads 128?
>> How is it with --num-threads 32(or smaller value)?
>
> Yes. I have tested with num-thread 1, 2, 8 and 32. Except for ?num-threads 1,
> all of the test fail.
>
> Thanks
> Minfei
>>
>
>
>


-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: 0001-improve-the-performance.patch
Type: text/x-patch
Size: 15290 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://lists.infradead.org/pipermail/kexec/attachments/20160301/f27fa2eb/attachment.bin>


[Index of Archives]     [LM Sensors]     [Linux Sound]     [ALSA Users]     [ALSA Devel]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Linux Media]     [Kernel]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Media]

  Powered by Linux