[PATCH v2] Improve the performance of --num-threads -d 31

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



> On Feb 24, 2016, at 10:20, Zhou, Wenjian/??? <zhouwj-fnst at cn.fujitsu.com> wrote:
> 
> Hi,
> 
> On 02/24/2016 09:43 AM, Minfei Huang wrote:
>> On 02/23/16 at 01:47pm, "Zhou, Wenjian/???" wrote:
>>> Hello, Minfei,
>>> 
>>> Does it occur every time?
>>> If not, I think I have known the reason.
>> 
>> Hi, Wenjian.
>> 
>> This patch is applied directly on version 1.5.9. And makedumpfile hangs
>> if option num-thread is appended.
>> 
> 
> I see.
> I'm working on it.
> 
> BTW, did you only test it with --num-threads 128?
> How is it with --num-threads 32(or smaller value)?

Yes. I have tested with num-thread 1, 2, 8 and 32. Except for ?num-threads 1,
all of the test fail.

Thanks
Minfei
> 




[Index of Archives]     [LM Sensors]     [Linux Sound]     [ALSA Users]     [ALSA Devel]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Linux Media]     [Kernel]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Media]

  Powered by Linux