Hi Simon,
On Tue, Nov 5, 2013 at 8:05 AM, Simon Horman <horms at verge.net.au> wrote:
> On Sun, Nov 03, 2013 at 03:08:50PM +0100, Geert Uytterhoeven wrote:
>> On Wed, Oct 16, 2013 at 9:22 AM, Simon Horman <horms at verge.net.au> wrote:
>> > I've taken a quick look over this and it seems reasonable to me.
>>
>> Thanks!
>>
>> > However, I wonder if I should wait for review of the kernel-side
>> > to be completed before applying the kexec-tools patches.
>> >
>> > Let me know what you think.
>>
>> The kexec-tools part seems to be stable. The issues to be sorted out are on
>> the kernel side.
>
> As the kexec-tools portion of this change isn't useful without the
> kernel portion I think I would like to wait before applying this series.
> Please repost once the kernel changes have been merged or if you
> would like them re-considered for any other reason.
The kernel part is working now.
I didn't make any changes to kexec-tools for v3.
Do you want me to resend them anyway, or can you just take v2?
Thanks again!
Gr{oetje,eeting}s,
Geert
--
Geert Uytterhoeven -- There's lots of Linux beyond ia32 -- geert at linux-m68k.org
In personal conversations with technical people, I call myself a hacker. But
when I'm talking to journalists I just say "programmer" or something like that.
-- Linus Torvalds
