On Wed, Jul 14, 2010 at 10:39:18AM -0500, Matthew McClintock wrote: > On Wed, 2010-07-14 at 10:32 -0500, Matthew McClintock wrote: > > On some actitectures the physical memory can be 64 bits, therefore > > the code that reads proc entries needs to take into account it could > > read either a 32 bit or 64bit value for the physical addresses. > > > > These patches did not get numbered, shall I resubmit with numbered > patches? The list below is sufficient, but could you cc the patches to linuxppc-dev at lists.ozlabs.org? > 0001-Fix-case-where-phys_addr_t-unsigned-long-when-rea.patch > 0002-Update-uImage-to-support-crash-kernel-and-misc-fixes.patch > 0003-Update-Elf-ppc-to-support-crash-kernel-and-misc-fixe.patch > 0004-Add-support-for-ramdisk-on-ppc32-for-uImage-ppc-and.patch > 0005-Add-support-for-reworking-flat-device-tree-support.patch
