On Wed, 2010-07-14 at 10:32 -0500, Matthew McClintock wrote: > On some actitectures the physical memory can be 64 bits, therefore > the code that reads proc entries needs to take into account it could > read either a 32 bit or 64bit value for the physical addresses. > These patches did not get numbered, shall I resubmit with numbered patches? 0001-Fix-case-where-phys_addr_t-unsigned-long-when-rea.patch 0002-Update-uImage-to-support-crash-kernel-and-misc-fixes.patch 0003-Update-Elf-ppc-to-support-crash-kernel-and-misc-fixe.patch 0004-Add-support-for-ramdisk-on-ppc32-for-uImage-ppc-and.patch 0005-Add-support-for-reworking-flat-device-tree-support.patch -M
