On Tue, Apr 06, 2010 at 09:51:08AM +0200, Sebastian Andrzej Siewior wrote: > * Simon Horman | 2010-04-06 16:12:52 [+1000]: > > >Ok, how about we a) merge your changes as is and b) try and get a patch > >upstream that we add to kexec-tools later. I understand your reasoning > >behind not wanting to diverge from libfdt-upstream, but at the same > >time, I'd like to get this fixed if possible. > Yeah, this sounds good to me. One of your fixes has allready been > applied [0]. There is no newer version of libfdt taged at this time. > Current HEAD of it produces a .so file. Is it okay with you if pull the > lib in and switch to a library once there is a official one? Yes, I think that is fine. Do you want me to just take the changes that you posted last week?
