* Simon Horman | 2010-04-06 16:12:52 [+1000]: >Ok, how about we a) merge your changes as is and b) try and get a patch >upstream that we add to kexec-tools later. I understand your reasoning >behind not wanting to diverge from libfdt-upstream, but at the same >time, I'd like to get this fixed if possible. Yeah, this sounds good to me. One of your fixes has allready been applied [0]. There is no newer version of libfdt taged at this time. Current HEAD of it produces a .so file. Is it okay with you if pull the lib in and switch to a library once there is a official one? [0] http://git.jdl.com/gitweb/?p=dtc.git;a=commit;h=b236893fc4bc173877adfa4270b14d7d7209fb10 Sebastian
