On Thu, Aug 13, 2009 at 9:34 PM, Rafael J. Wysocki<rjw@xxxxxxx> wrote: > On Thursday 13 August 2009, Martin-Éric Racine wrote: >> On Thu, Aug 13, 2009 at 5:54 PM, Rafael J. Wysocki<rjw@xxxxxxx> wrote: >> > On Thursday 13 August 2009, Martin-Éric Racine wrote: >> >> 2009/8/13 Martin-Éric Racine <q-funk@xxxxxx>: >> >> > On Thu, Aug 13, 2009 at 12:07 PM, Ingo Molnar<mingo@xxxxxxx> wrote: >> >> >> * Martin-Éric Racine <q-funk@xxxxxx> wrote: >> >> >>> Yes, this bug is still valid. >> >> >>> >> >> >>> Ubuntu kernel team member Leann Ogasawara and I are slowly >> >> >>> bisecting our way through the changes that took place since 2.6.30 >> >> >>> to find the commit that introduced this regression. Please stay >> >> >>> tuned. >> >> >> >> >> >> hm, the only outright Geode related commit was: >> >> >> >> >> >> d6c585a: x86: geode: Mark mfgpt irq IRQF_TIMER to prevent resume failure >> >> >> >> >> >> the jpg at: >> >> >> >> >> >> http://launchpadlibrarian.net/28892781/00002.jpg >> >> >> >> >> >> is very out of focus - but what i could decypher suggests a >> >> >> pagefault crash in the VFS code, in generic_delete_inode(). >> >> >> >> This one might be a bit better: >> >> >> >> http://launchpadlibrarian.net/30267494/2.6.31-5.24.jpg > > Hmm. This looks like a sysfs oops to my untrained eye. The bisect I did with Leann Ogasawara has narrowed the kernel panic down to the following: commit f19d4a8fa6f9b6ccf54df0971c97ffcaa390b7b0 Author: Al Viro <viro@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> Date: Mon Jun 8 19:50:45 2009 -0400 add caching of ACLs in struct inode No helpers, no conversions yet. Signed-off-by: Al Viro <viro@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> Best Regards, Martin-Éric -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe kernel-testers" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
