On Thursday 13 August 2009, Martin-Éric Racine wrote: > On Thu, Aug 13, 2009 at 5:54 PM, Rafael J. Wysocki<rjw@xxxxxxx> wrote: > > On Thursday 13 August 2009, Martin-Éric Racine wrote: > >> 2009/8/13 Martin-Éric Racine <q-funk@xxxxxx>: > >> > On Thu, Aug 13, 2009 at 12:07 PM, Ingo Molnar<mingo@xxxxxxx> wrote: > >> >> * Martin-Éric Racine <q-funk@xxxxxx> wrote: > >> >>> Yes, this bug is still valid. > >> >>> > >> >>> Ubuntu kernel team member Leann Ogasawara and I are slowly > >> >>> bisecting our way through the changes that took place since 2.6.30 > >> >>> to find the commit that introduced this regression. Please stay > >> >>> tuned. > >> >> > >> >> hm, the only outright Geode related commit was: > >> >> > >> >> d6c585a: x86: geode: Mark mfgpt irq IRQF_TIMER to prevent resume failure > >> >> > >> >> the jpg at: > >> >> > >> >> http://launchpadlibrarian.net/28892781/00002.jpg > >> >> > >> >> is very out of focus - but what i could decypher suggests a > >> >> pagefault crash in the VFS code, in generic_delete_inode(). > >> > >> This one might be a bit better: > >> > >> http://launchpadlibrarian.net/30267494/2.6.31-5.24.jpg Hmm. This looks like a sysfs oops to my untrained eye. Thanks, Rafael -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe kernel-testers" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
