2009/1/20 Christoph Hellwig <hch@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>: > On Tue, Jan 20, 2009 at 09:54:44PM +0300, Alexander Beregalov wrote: >> Hi >> >> Is it a new bug? >> It is pre-2.6.29-rc1 kernel, which was supossed to be free of the bug >> "fs_is_ok, file: fs/xfs/xfs_btree.c, line: 3327" > > From the trace it's a post-btree consolidation kernel, so all the bugs > in -rc1 are there, too. It looks like this is the readahead type > cockup that Geert noticed, so this particular one should be fixed in > -rc2. > > I would strongly recommend to just turn on CNFIG_LBD for post-2.6.28 > kernels for now as all the problems showing up are without CONFIG_LBD. Yes, both bugs do not appear on kernel with CONFIG_LBD=y. But I do not need LBD. Does XFS strongly require LBD? Should I always turn it on even if I do not have files or devices of size 2Tb+ ? -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe kernel-testers" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
