On Sat, Jan 10, 2009 at 06:09:05PM +0300, Alexander Beregalov wrote: > > That would be odd as 7f7c39ccb6045cf1fd5e7684a484c445291b44d4 only > > changes the tracing code which currently isn't enabled. Or we > > get some sort of miscompilation due slightly different noop > > macros. > I meant the first bad commit is between these two commits. All of them > fail to compile as is, > I added xfs_btree_trace.h manually to compile it, I got different bugs > on these commits, > but I am not sure if they are really different. Like this: Ah crap. When lachlan checked in the btree tracing he forgot to add that header and it only got in after that. Can you bisect further between those commit by just using xfs_btree_trce.h from a newer version? It hasn't had a single change yet since it was commited. This is quite important as all changes between these two revisions are quite large and deal with consolidating the btree code. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe kernel-testers" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
