On Sunday, 21 of December 2008, Ingo Molnar wrote: > > * Rafael J. Wysocki <rjw@xxxxxxx> wrote: > > > This message has been generated automatically as a part of a report > > of recent regressions. > > > > The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions > > from 2.6.27. Please verify if it still should be listed and let me know > > (either way). > > > > Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=12156 > > Subject : v2.6.28-rc2: x86_32 relocation regression? > > Submitter : Vegard Nossum <vegard.nossum@xxxxxxxxx> > > Date : 2008-11-24 21:19 (27 days old) > > References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=122756158220966&w=4 > > not really a regression but a long-standing inconvenience/bug of the debug > symbols of relocatable kernels. (ever since relocatable kernels were added > in '06 or so.) Nevertheless we queued up a revert of the defconfig change > for .29, to not expose it in the defconfig: > > f269b07: x86: revert CONFIG_RELOCATABLE=y defconfig change > > so i think it can be taken off the regressions list. Dropped. Thanks, Rafael -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe kernel-testers" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
