* Rafael J. Wysocki <rjw@xxxxxxx> wrote: > This message has been generated automatically as a part of a report > of recent regressions. > > The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions > from 2.6.27. Please verify if it still should be listed and let me know > (either way). > > Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=12156 > Subject : v2.6.28-rc2: x86_32 relocation regression? > Submitter : Vegard Nossum <vegard.nossum@xxxxxxxxx> > Date : 2008-11-24 21:19 (27 days old) > References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=122756158220966&w=4 not really a regression but a long-standing inconvenience/bug of the debug symbols of relocatable kernels. (ever since relocatable kernels were added in '06 or so.) Nevertheless we queued up a revert of the defconfig change for .29, to not expose it in the defconfig: f269b07: x86: revert CONFIG_RELOCATABLE=y defconfig change so i think it can be taken off the regressions list. Ingo -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe kernel-testers" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
