On Thu, 25 Sep 2008, Jesse Barnes wrote: > However, the "Factory" log at #425480 *does* indicate that a GEM aware > 2D driver was loaded (the "[drm:i915_getparam] *ERROR* Unknown parameter > 5" message indicates as much), but the kernel was definitely not GEM > aware otherwise the call would have succeeded. So that rules out GEM > proper, but it could still be a bug in one of the non-GEM paths in the > experimental xf86-video-intel bits the various distros seem to be > picking up. That was exactly the point I was trying to make, that these error paths will probably also need auditing, once we rule out the possibility of NVRAM being overwritten from kernelspace. Thanks, -- Jiri Kosina SUSE Labs -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe kernel-testers" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html