From: "Dave Airlie" <airlied@xxxxxxxxx> Date: Wed, 24 Sep 2008 07:09:09 +1000 > On Wed, Sep 24, 2008 at 7:05 AM, David Miller <davem@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > From: Jiri Kosina <jkosina@xxxxxxx> > > Date: Tue, 23 Sep 2008 16:29:16 +0200 (CEST) > > > >> On Mon, 22 Sep 2008, David Miller wrote: > >> > >> > So I went through the changes from 2.6.27-rc5 until the SHA1 > >> > ID ec0c15afb41fd9ad45b53468b60db50170e22346 and there were > >> > definitely no E1000 or E1000E changes during that time. > >> > >> Some recent comments on [1] seem to indicate that this is somehow coupled > >> into prior problems/panics with Intel graphics. > > > > My current suspicion in all of this is either the GEM kernel patches > > or recent X server. > > > > I don't think OpenSUSE was shipping any of the GEM bits. Good data point, can someone confirm this? Also, what X server version is the effected OpenSUSE shipping? -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe kernel-testers" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
