On Sat, Aug 30, 2008 at 6:25 PM, David Witbrodt <dawitbro@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > >> please use split_e820_reserve_xx2.patch instead... > > OK, that produces the same result: a happy kernel! > > I compared the full 'dmesg' output from the previous build and the > current build using diff: the only differences were trivial -- > return times from initcall functions, and the order in which some > initcalls were performed was different very late in the boot process. good, let wait for Ingo back to check the two patches too. YH -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe kernel-testers" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
