> please use split_e820_reserve_xx2.patch instead... OK, that produces the same result: a happy kernel! I compared the full 'dmesg' output from the previous build and the current build using diff: the only differences were trivial -- return times from initcall functions, and the order in which some initcalls were performed was different very late in the boot process. Thanks Yinghai, Dave W. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe kernel-testers" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
