Adrian Bunk wrote:
The discussion in Bugzilla whether it is a regression at all can be
condensed to the following question:
Can a struct that is part of the 2.6.26 userspace headers be defined to
be part of an "experimental ABI" and therefore be changed?
It is part of the experimental ABI.
However, as I'm going to apply your patch (as being the simplest fix,
and as there is no measurable performance impact), the question is moot.
--
error compiling committee.c: too many arguments to function
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe kernel-testers" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
