On Sat, Aug 23, 2008 at 08:10:16PM +0200, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote: > This message has been generated automatically as a part of a report > of recent regressions. > > The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions > from 2.6.26. Please verify if it still should be listed and let me know > (either way). > > > Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=11254 > Subject : KVM: fix userspace ABI breakage > Submitter : Adrian Bunk <bunk@xxxxxxxxxx> > Date : 21 Jul 2008 17:58:26 (0 days old) > References : http://lkml.org/lkml/2008/7/21/197 > Handled-By : Adrian Bunk <bunk@xxxxxxxxxx> > Patch : http://lkml.org/lkml/2008/7/21/197 The discussion in Bugzilla whether it is a regression at all can be condensed to the following question: Can a struct that is part of the 2.6.26 userspace headers be defined to be part of an "experimental ABI" and therefore be changed? cu Adrian -- "Is there not promise of rain?" Ling Tan asked suddenly out of the darkness. There had been need of rain for many days. "Only a promise," Lao Er said. Pearl S. Buck - Dragon Seed -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe kernel-testers" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
