Re: 2.6.26-rc9: Reported regressions from 2.6.25

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 




On Mon, 7 Jul 2008, Adrian Bunk wrote:
>
> When did you tell me that maintainers should not or cannot be Cc'ed on 
> regression reports?

That is not what I'm complaining about.

I'm complaining about the fact that you *always* argue against closing 
bugreports.

You have argued against it for over a YEAR now. And every single time I 
tell you that you are wrong, and exactly *why* you are wrong.

If a reporter doesn't respond to say "it's still open", it needs to be 
closed. It doesn't matter one whit whether there has been developer action 
on it or not. We cannot keep old reports open - it's a total waste for 
developers to even _look_ at anything that is more than roughly a month 
old and hasn't been verified to be still be an issue.

			Linus
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe kernel-testers" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

[Index of Archives]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]

  Powered by Linux