Re: 2.6.26-rc9: Reported regressions from 2.6.25

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Sunday, 6 of July 2008, Adrian Bunk wrote:
> On Sun, Jul 06, 2008 at 07:05:49PM +0200, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> > 
> > Also, in the next couple of days I'll be closing the bugs the reporters of
> > which have been totally unresponsive.
> >...
> 
> If no action by us gets combined with automated weekly emails then
> no responses to the latter is not an unexpected event.
> 
> Such a submitter might be perfectly responsive to actual work on a bug 
> while really pissed off by getting the bug closed.
> 
> Look e.g. at #10865 that had a 1 month gap in submitter responses,
> but the actual problem is that noone of us ever bothered to look at
> this Oops...
> 
> I just did a run through all open 2.6.26-rc regressions, and I did not 
> find a single one where we seem to be waiting for some time for an 
> answer of the submitter. [1]

The following are my candidates:

10629
10786
10815
10906 (the thread has apparently died)
11009

Thanks,
Rafael
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe kernel-testers" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

[Index of Archives]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]

  Powered by Linux