Re: 2.6.26-rc9: Reported regressions from 2.6.25

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Sun, Jul 06, 2008 at 07:05:49PM +0200, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> 
> Also, in the next couple of days I'll be closing the bugs the reporters of
> which have been totally unresponsive.
>...

If no action by us gets combined with automated weekly emails then
no responses to the latter is not an unexpected event.

Such a submitter might be perfectly responsive to actual work on a bug 
while really pissed off by getting the bug closed.

Look e.g. at #10865 that had a 1 month gap in submitter responses,
but the actual problem is that noone of us ever bothered to look at
this Oops...

I just did a run through all open 2.6.26-rc regressions, and I did not 
find a single one where we seem to be waiting for some time for an 
answer of the submitter. [1]

> Thanks,
> Rafael

cu
Adrian

[1] unless there was communication not linked from Bugzilla

-- 

       "Is there not promise of rain?" Ling Tan asked suddenly out
        of the darkness. There had been need of rain for many days.
       "Only a promise," Lao Er said.
                                       Pearl S. Buck - Dragon Seed

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe kernel-testers" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

[Index of Archives]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]

  Powered by Linux