Re: willing to involve in KSPP

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Hi Kees,

> > I'm Shyam, currently working in linux kernel and embedded domain.
> >
> > I'm interested work in Kernel Self Protection Project.
> >
> > Would you please suggest which task should i pick ?
> >
> > I'd like to pick some simple task to get started.
> > I see a list of todo [1] but this page is not updated since 31st October
>
> I've updated this list now. Sorry for the delay!

Thanks for this update.

> > I don't have much experience in linux kernel so I'm not sure to pick which particular task,  please suggest me  some task.
>
> One item on there that looks pretty simple and would get you started
> would be to regularized the use of three different macros that all do
> the same thing: replace sizeof_field() and SIZEOF_FIELD() with the
> more common FIELD_SIZEOF()
>
> $ git grep '\bsizeof_field\b' | wc -l
> 30

These are spreaded all over kernel source tree.

> $ git grep '\bSIZEOF_FIELD\b' | wc -l
> 2

This was added recently and I think we will need a checkpatch entry to
warn developers about this.

> $ git grep '\bFIELD_SIZEOF\b' | wc -l
> 291
>
> Which likely means moving the FIELD_SIZEOF macro into
> include/linux/stddef.h for reuse in offsetofend().

My only concern is, if it picked by different maintainers then it may
break some other trees.
I think it should be picked by single maintainer so which tree should
I submit these changes ?


Thanks a lot,
Shyam



[Index of Archives]     [Linux Samsung SoC]     [Linux Rockchip SoC]     [Linux Actions SoC]     [Linux for Synopsys ARC Processors]     [Linux NFS]     [Linux NILFS]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]


  Powered by Linux