On Saturday September 03 2016 18:02:42 Duncan wrote:
Thanks Duncan,
>Some plasma components in particular already have had commits bumping to
>qt-5.7 minimum. In some cases they were reverted, but I don't believe
>all of them have been.
That's more or less what I was a bit afraid of. I do have some questions about the whole idea of having a LTS Qt release, much as I'd love not having to worry about updating such a central bit of code every few months. However, I also think something like KF5 Plasma shouldn't have the latest Qt version as a minimum requirement. But that's just me, I'm not the kind of dev who's always ready to pounce on each and every new gimmick ;)
>allowing stand-alone apps to be able to update frameworks requirements
>while sticking with qt-5.6 LTS minimums.
All hail ...
R.
