On Tuesday, 2012-10-16, Duncan wrote: > Kevin Krammer posted on Mon, 15 Oct 2012 10:44:45 +0200 as excerpted: > >> Just a heads-up. KMail isn't the same old reasonably stable app that > >> it used to be; that I used for nearing a decade. > > > > It still is. Using it every day, for business and private messaging. > > No disrespect intended as you've been helpful to me, but IMO for a normal > user, that's a technical difference without a practical application. > > Think about it. Why would people use kmail if not for mail? If that > mail is lost or there's complications with the local database storage > thereof, it doesn't matter if it's kmail's fault, the backend's fault, or > the fault of some malware holding it for ransom, to the user, it's lost > mail, or otherwise unexpected mail behavior (mail or address resources > unavailable, etc). That wasn't what I intended to convey. My point was that there are two versions of KMail. A new one based on components that allow alternative user interfaces for different types of workflows and the traditional one. The latter is as stable as it has always been, perfectyl suited for people with loads of email. It is, if I remember correctly, even available as a company maintained [1] Enterprise build. Cheers, Kevin [1] By Intevation GmbH, Germany, again IIRC -- Kevin Krammer, KDE developer, xdg-utils developer KDE user support, developer mentoring
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
___________________________________________________ This message is from the kde mailing list. Account management: https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/kde. Archives: http://lists.kde.org/. More info: http://www.kde.org/faq.html.
