On Saturday 12 December 2009 18:30:46 Jose Celestino wrote: > On Qui, 2009-12-10 at 21:21 +0100, Kevin Krammer wrote: > > On Wednesday, 2009-12-09, Draciron Smith wrote: > > > On Wed, Dec 9, 2009 at 6:36 AM, Kevin Krammer <kevin.krammer@xxxxxx> > > > wrote: > > > > > > > > > Because it tears at everything that made KDE dear to a large number of > > > people. KDE 4 is NOT KDE except in name. It has betrayed the > > > principles and ideas that made KDE so successful. > > > > Quite overgeneralizing statement. > > Most of KDE's products is exactly like they used to be, often developed a > > lot further, e.g. Okular surpassing KPDF by far. > > Notorious counter-example is Amarok, it went from a powerful media > player to a useless P.O.S. > > But I guess most of everything else (that I use, at least) as improved, > Digikam, Gwenview, Konsole, etc. > > > > -- Jose Celestino SAPO.pt::Systems http://www.sapo.pt > --------------------------------------------------------------------- * > Progress (n.): The process through which Usenet has evolved from smart > people in front of dumb terminals to dumb people in front of smart > terminals. > That might be your own opinion. I have in Amarok2 a player, which is far beyond 1.4 has ever been. Thats my opinion, so who's right now? Please don't state your opinion to be everyones. Steven
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
___________________________________________________ This message is from the kde mailing list. Account management: https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/kde. Archives: http://lists.kde.org/. More info: http://www.kde.org/faq.html.
