On Qui, 2009-12-10 at 21:21 +0100, Kevin Krammer wrote: > On Wednesday, 2009-12-09, Draciron Smith wrote: > > On Wed, Dec 9, 2009 at 6:36 AM, Kevin Krammer <kevin.krammer@xxxxxx> wrote: > > > > Because it tears at everything that made KDE dear to a large number of > > people. KDE 4 is NOT KDE except in name. It has betrayed the > > principles and ideas that made KDE so successful. > > Quite overgeneralizing statement. > Most of KDE's products is exactly like they used to be, often developed a lot > further, e.g. Okular surpassing KPDF by far. > Notorious counter-example is Amarok, it went from a powerful media player to a useless P.O.S. But I guess most of everything else (that I use, at least) as improved, Digikam, Gwenview, Konsole, etc. -- Jose Celestino SAPO.pt::Systems http://www.sapo.pt --------------------------------------------------------------------- * Progress (n.): The process through which Usenet has evolved from smart people in front of dumb terminals to dumb people in front of smart terminals.
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
___________________________________________________ This message is from the kde mailing list. Account management: https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/kde. Archives: http://lists.kde.org/. More info: http://www.kde.org/faq.html.
