Re: Why KDE4 is called KDE?

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Draciron Smith posted on Tue, 08 Dec 2009 22:44:44 -0600 as excerpted:

> KDE 4 lost tons of funcitonality and is far less customizable. You would
> honestly trade all that for eye candy?

FWIW, I haven't found kde4 significantly less customizable in general.  
True, there's some stuff still broken yet (including khotkeys multikey, 
my primary way of launching apps in kde3 -- and kde4 now that I setup my 
own scripted solution to handle it), way to much IMO to be rated as ready 
for ordinary use (except by devs, for developing their own apps), but 
it's generally customizable.

One could argue it's /more/ customizable in may ways... such as just what 
sort of stuff can go on the desktop.

-- 
Duncan - List replies preferred.   No HTML msgs.
"Every nonfree program has a lord, a master --
and if you use the program, he is your master."  Richard Stallman

___________________________________________________
This message is from the kde mailing list.
Account management:  https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/kde.
Archives: http://lists.kde.org/.
More info: http://www.kde.org/faq.html.

[Index of Archives]     [Trinity (TDE) Desktop Users]     [Fedora KDE]     [Fedora Desktop]     [Linux Kernel]     [Gimp]     [GIMP for Windows]     [Gnome]     [Yosemite Hiking]
  Powered by Linux