On Tuesday 08 December 2009 13:31:17 spir wrote: > My question seems difficult to understand. I'm not arguing on one side or > the other. I know tons of individual positions on the topic -- and yours > are indeed worth beeing taken into account, but there are better places. > But that's not what I ask for: I ask for (a) pointer(s) to kde designers' > previous and present POVs -- that's all. See Dotan's statement quoted > above. I would like to be in a position to say like him "I agree/disagree > with <this>."; for this, I need source information about <this>. > Unlike the academic world there is little mileage in documenting this process. I suggest that if you really want to know how decisions are made you google for the relevant development mailing lists - there are many, because many refer to their own project only - and read archives. It is there and on IRC sessions, of which there will be no public archive, where most decisions will be made - other, that is, than on the 'sprints' where a group of developers meet up physically to work on specific issues. Anne -- KDE Community Working Group New to KDE4? - get help from http://userbase.kde.org
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
___________________________________________________ This message is from the kde mailing list. Account management: https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/kde. Archives: http://lists.kde.org/. More info: http://www.kde.org/faq.html.
