On 17/10-2009 14:38 Anne Wilson <cannewilson@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> On Saturday 17 October 2009 11:36:57 Thomas Olsen wrote:
> > On 17/10-2009 04:23 Ryan Rix <phrkonaleash@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> > > Andrew Mason wrote:
> > > > Plasma it's self is pretty easily replaced, any of the desktop shells
> > > > will work.
> > >
> > > And it's VERY easily customisable to fit your tastes more than any
> > > other desktop shell...
> >
> > +1
> >
> > I started out customizing it to act and look like KDE3 but now I have a
> > heavily customized workplace which serves my needs. The strength and
> > weakness of KDE. I prefer the strength!
> >
> > (and I know the developers are trying to limit the options of
> > customization but users demand it - it's a sharp edge to walk on)
>
> The funny thing is that in the past the criticism was often that it had
> just too many options - IOW was too configurable. My own feeling has that
> KDE has always appealed to individualists, who want maximum possibilities
> ;-)
My sentiment too, but I haven't really much to compare with bc I've used KDE
exclusively since about 3 months after Matthias Ettrich started the project
:-) '96-'97?
--
Best Regards / Med venlig hilsen
Thomas Olsen
___________________________________________________
This message is from the kde mailing list.
Account management: https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/kde.
Archives: http://lists.kde.org/.
More info: http://www.kde.org/faq.html.
