On Saturday 17 October 2009 11:36:57 Thomas Olsen wrote: > On 17/10-2009 04:23 Ryan Rix <phrkonaleash@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > Andrew Mason wrote: > > > Plasma it's self is pretty easily replaced, any of the desktop shells > > > will work. > > > > And it's VERY easily customisable to fit your tastes more than any other > > desktop shell... > > +1 > > I started out customizing it to act and look like KDE3 but now I have a > heavily customized workplace which serves my needs. The strength and > weakness of KDE. I prefer the strength! > > (and I know the developers are trying to limit the options of customization > but users demand it - it's a sharp edge to walk on) > The funny thing is that in the past the criticism was often that it had just too many options - IOW was too configurable. My own feeling has that KDE has always appealed to individualists, who want maximum possibilities ;-) Anne -- New to KDE4? - get help from http://userbase.kde.org Just found a cool new feature? Add it to UserBase
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
___________________________________________________ This message is from the kde mailing list. Account management: https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/kde. Archives: http://lists.kde.org/. More info: http://www.kde.org/faq.html.
