James Richard Tyrer wrote: > Matthew Woehlke wrote: >> James Richard Tyrer wrote: >>> Dotan Cohen wrote: >>>> KDE devs consider deviation from KDE 3 to _not_ be a bug. Same for >>>> missing features. It is as if KDE 4 is a separate project entirely, >>>> which in essence it is. Requests for "KDE3-like" are feature requests, >>>> not bugs. >>> I don't know what is wrong with the developers. Apparently any excuse >>> not to fix a bug is acceptable. >> Do you know what would happen if we took the attitude that "KDE4 must do >> everything KDE3 did, plus new features"? > > Interesting straw man, or perhaps you simply misunderstood what I said. I was responding to Dotan as much (more, probably) as to you. But seriously, let's not start the mud-slinging. We're rapidly degenerating from bug report through quasi-accusations and antagonistic rebuttals into a full-fledged flame war. > IAC, it must be possible for the user to do everything with KDE4 that > they did with KDE3. That was lies bloat. Been there, lived with it (still have to, at work :-( ). It sucks. Don't get me wrong, egregious omissions of often-used features are one thing. But sometimes you have a "feature" that was just a bad idea. (Note also I am not necessarily talking about anything in this thread; in fact I haven't even looked at the bug report. I'm simply talking about this attitude in general.) Let's all accept that KDE4 doesn't have to be a strict superset of KDE3, and yes, sometimes that is a *good* thing, quit throwing wild accusations at the developers, and get back to the original topic. -- Matthew Please do not quote my e-mail address unobfuscated in message bodies. -- Use the --force, Luke -- Riccardo Iaconelli ___________________________________________________ This message is from the kde mailing list. Account management: https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/kde. Archives: http://lists.kde.org/. More info: http://www.kde.org/faq.html.