| On Friday 20 February 2009 06:32:56 Nikos Chantziaras wrote: > Rick Miles wrote: > > On Thursday 19 February 2009 17:48:31 Nikos Chantziaras wrote: > > > Your desktop can be whatever you want it to be. > > > > and I don't want to have to put a folder named anything on top of it to > > be able to add my own icons to it. > > And why not, if I may ask? That's how it works. And does work nicely. > > > > You can have > > > ~/.desktopicons instead of ~/Desktop. I don't see where the problem > > > is, if there is a problem at all. > > > > The method you prefer is discussed in the KDE docs under the heading " > > If you prefer a Classic, KDE3-style Desktop" I don't. I'd rather learn > > how to work with KDE4 but not be constrained with what I can do. > > A folder view *IS* part of KDE4. Therefore, you are working with KDE4. > > I still fail to understand what the issue is. All of that what you > described is possible by simply using a folder view for the entire > desktop. The fact that the icons will be saved on disk on some > directory is hurting you in some way? OK folks the following is a bit verbose and is really to answer Nikos' question then perhaps this thread can be closed. Cheers, http://turtlespond.net |
___________________________________________________ This message is from the kde mailing list. Account management: https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/kde. Archives: http://lists.kde.org/. More info: http://www.kde.org/faq.html.
