Rick Miles wrote: > On Thursday 19 February 2009 17:48:31 Nikos Chantziaras wrote: > > Your desktop can be whatever you want it to be. > and I don't want to have to put a folder named anything on top of it to > be able to add my own icons to it. And why not, if I may ask? That's how it works. And does work nicely. > > You can have > > ~/.desktopicons instead of ~/Desktop. I don't see where the problem is, > > if there is a problem at all. > > > The method you prefer is discussed in the KDE docs under the heading " > If you prefer a Classic, KDE3-style Desktop" I don't. I'd rather learn > how to work with KDE4 but not be constrained with what I can do. A folder view *IS* part of KDE4. Therefore, you are working with KDE4. I still fail to understand what the issue is. All of that what you described is possible by simply using a folder view for the entire desktop. The fact that the icons will be saved on disk on some directory is hurting you in some way? ___________________________________________________ This message is from the kde mailing list. Account management: https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/kde. Archives: http://lists.kde.org/. More info: http://www.kde.org/faq.html.