On Thursday 22 December 2005 15:06, Jose Celestino wrote: > Words by Justin Denick [Thu, Dec 22, 2005 at 08:45:29AM -0500]: > > On 12/22/05, Jose Celestino <japc@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > > So, who can post me on the current state of KDE desktop > > > indexing/searching? > > > > > > I've tried Kat a while ago and it seemed bad. Nothing similar to beagle > > > (at > > > least from the demos and screenshots I saw - > > > > C'mon don't go starting up any flames > > > > I don't use gnome crap anyway). > > > :) Ok, you're right. > : > > Nobody needs that. But can't beagle be used in place of kde. Sure you'll > > need some gnomeish libs but isn't that all. > > As I said haven't tried it. But gnome applications tend to be too simple in > interface, too complex in implementation. I fear the number of processes > and libs and whatever I have to install for it. And it would never > integrate with KDE, web history, mail, im, etc. > > But that's not the point (and I really not here to trash on gnome). > The point is: > > Is there any viable alternative for KDE? I think there is a KIO slave named kio_lucene or something similar, that uses the Lucene indexer which Beagle uses as well. Cheers, Kevin -- Kevin Krammer <kevin.krammer@xxxxxx> Qt/KDE Developer, Debian User Moderator: www.mrunix.de (German), www.qtforum.org
Attachment:
pgpUrowou9CxF.pgp
Description: PGP signature
___________________________________________________ . Account management: https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/kde. Archives: http://lists.kde.org/. More info: http://www.kde.org/faq.html.
