On Monday 04 July 2005 20:40, Merton Campbell Crockett wrote:
> The Mac OS-style menubar is a historical relic from the days when monitors
> were small and a Mac could only run one application at a time.
And I'm using it with multiple apps without any problems.
> Actually, there's a much more basic question that has to be asked. Who is
> going to fund all of the changes needed to have a Mac OS-style menubar?
What "funds" are you referring to here? I thought KDE is made mostly by
volunteers.
> Assume that I am a software developer. I am hoping to become the next
> Bill Gates. To achieve this goal I need my software to run in as many
> window environments as possible. Why should I expend time and money on
> the niche market of Mac OS X and KDE users that like the Mac OS-style
> menubar?
KDE-apps already work nicely with universal menubar just fine, so I don't see
your point.
> You are assuming that people don't tailor their work environment. It
> takes significantly longer than a minute to go through each of one's
> commonly used applications to configure them for the changed screen area.
What changes are you referring to here? In my case it really did take just one
minute. I enabled the universal menubar, and all my KDE-apps worked
beautifully with it.
> Out of curiosity, I enabled the menubar at the top of the display. The
> menubar didn't change as focus moved from window to window. The menubar
> in each window didn't disappear. The biggest change was the reduced area
> available for windows on the desktop. Instead of 75 lines of text, I
> could only display 72 lines of text.
In my case, all KDE-apps work just fine with the menubar. GTK+-apps are a
different matter, but I don't really use those, so.... But even that could be
fixed with some shared menubar-specs or something.
___________________________________________________
.
Account management: https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/kde.
Archives: http://lists.kde.org/.
More info: http://www.kde.org/faq.html.
