> I Disagree quite strongly. I found the icon Zoom feature very usable, and > I've never had any problems with it. I find it difficult to swallow that > the programmers who work on this stuff would be unable to overcome this > difficulty. > > Who decides what's "usable" anyway? :-D Considering Linux is all about > choice wouldn't it be better to have this in the hands of the user? I like > it, and from what I'm hearing many others do as well. I would hazard to suggest that the developer who gives up his free time to maintain the code is most qualified to make such decisions. If the code is causing bugs to pile up and the effort to fix it is far greater than any gain in functionality, then it goes. Whether the effort is in fact greater is highly subjective, and only the person who is hacking on the code can truly judge. It is after all his time and his effort he's weighing in the balance. -- JH KDE Frequently Asked Questions: http://docs.kde.org/en/HEAD/kdebase/faq/ panic("esp_handle: current_SC == penguin within interrupt!"); ___________________________________________________ . Account management: https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/kde. Archives: http://lists.kde.org/. More info: http://www.kde.org/faq.html.