Well, I have to agree in some ways with the original poster, and some ways not.
I would say Firefox is definetly better than Konqueror for the
following reasons:
-UI, Konqueror's default UI is just in-exusable, it has way too many
buttons, and alot of them look the same so its hard to tell which one
is wich.
-Speed, I find FireFox faster, but expereince will vary
-Support, Konqueror use is still below 0.5%, Firefox has good support
from major companies, this is not the IE argument, I always used
netscape, but it never went below %2, so it never stopped being
supported
OpenOffice is much more mature, and has alot of those extra important features.
-KOffice's UI isn't exactly great either.
Kontact is nicer than Thunderbird for most e-mail stuff.
-It is much more feature complete
-Though, the Mozilla project has much better UIs.
No comment on the audio players, I use Amarok, which has the worst UI
I have seen in a long time, but its good playlists and collections
features are what make it better.
No comment in instant messengers, I use aMSN, I only need the MSN
protocol and aMSN seems to have much better support for it, more of
its features.
--
Taylor Byrnes
Rediscover The Web
Download Firefox
http://www.getfirefox.com
___________________________________________________
.
Account management: https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/kde.
Archives: http://lists.kde.org/.
More info: http://www.kde.org/faq.html.
