As an aside, I notice this same behavior in Windows. Explorer has no print
command at all when you're browsing directories. If you want to print a file
listing, DOS is the only way. Is Konqueror mimicing explorer in this regard?
I doubt there is any technical reason. As you say, if the same data were a
web page, it would print fine.
Should we request this feature in Konqueror? I would find it useful also. I
don't really have time to initiate it, but if you feel like starting it I
will be glad to help out in whatever way I can.
Larry
On Monday 26 July 2004 05:09, Albrecht Mehl wrote:
> Roy J. Tellason wrote:
> >> For some curious reason konqueror - KDE 3.2 from SUSE
> >>9.1 - is able to print web pages, but not to print file trees ('print'
> >>in the document menu active resp. inactive).
> >>
> >> - Why this different behaviour of konqueror?
> >> - Is there a way to circumvent this obstacle?
> >
> > You could try using a screen capture utility such as ksnapshot, and
> > perhaps processing the result with the gimp and then printing it.
>
> I suspect ksnapshot to process just what's on the screen. But my file
> tree is several 'monitor heights' heigh so that what is below the lower
> margin of the screen will not be visible in the snapshot. A direct
> print by konqueror could handle this: when you receive a web page also
> several
> monitor heights heigh the complete information will be printed.
> Is my suspecion concerning the ksnapshot correct?
>
> The different behaviour of konqueror - print active vs. print inactive -
> must be caused by a bit somewhere deep inside, but nevertheless
> at a specific location. If someone knew of this location so that
> konqueror could be manipulated to print even file trees, my problem
> would be solved.
>
> A. Mehl
___________________________________________________
.
Account management: https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/kde.
Archives: http://lists.kde.org/.
More info: http://www.kde.org/faq.html.
