Re: [RFC][PATCH] fix io_uring_show_fdinfo() misuse of ->d_iname

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



	Output of io_uring_show_fdinfo() has several problems:
* racy use of ->d_iname
* junk if the name is long - in that case it's not stored in ->d_iname
at all
* lack of quoting (names can contain newlines, etc. - or be equal to "<none>",
for that matter).
* lines for empty slots are pointless noise - we already have the total
amount, so having just the non-empty ones would carry the same information.

Signed-off-by: Al Viro <viro@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
---
diff --git a/io_uring/fdinfo.c b/io_uring/fdinfo.c
index b214e5a407b5..f60d0a9d505e 100644
--- a/io_uring/fdinfo.c
+++ b/io_uring/fdinfo.c
@@ -211,10 +211,11 @@ __cold void io_uring_show_fdinfo(struct seq_file *m, struct file *file)
 
 		if (ctx->file_table.data.nodes[i])
 			f = io_slot_file(ctx->file_table.data.nodes[i]);
-		if (f)
-			seq_printf(m, "%5u: %s\n", i, file_dentry(f)->d_iname);
-		else
-			seq_printf(m, "%5u: <none>\n", i);
+		if (f) {
+			seq_printf(m, "%5u: ", i);
+			seq_file_path(m, f, " \t\n\\");
+			seq_puts(m, "\n");
+		}
 	}
 	seq_printf(m, "UserBufs:\t%u\n", ctx->buf_table.nr);
 	for (i = 0; has_lock && i < ctx->buf_table.nr; i++) {




[Index of Archives]     [Linux Samsung SoC]     [Linux Rockchip SoC]     [Linux Actions SoC]     [Linux for Synopsys ARC Processors]     [Linux NFS]     [Linux NILFS]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]


  Powered by Linux