[RFC][PATCH] fix io_uring_show_fdinfo() misuse of ->d_iname

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



	The output of io_uring_show_fdinfo() is crazy - for
each slot of io_uring file_table it produces either
INDEX: <none>
or
INDEX: NAME
where INDEX runs through all numbers from 0 to ctx->file_table.data.nr-1
and NAME is usually the last component of pathname of file in slot
#INDEX.  Usually == if it's no longer than 39 bytes.  If it's longer,
you get junk.  Oh, and if it contains newlines, you get several lines and
no way to tell that it has happened, them's the breaks.  If it's happens
to be /home/luser/<none>, well, what you see is indistinguishable from what
you'd get if it hadn't been there...

According to Jens, it's *not* cast in stone, so we should be able to
change that to something saner.  I see two options:

1) replace NAME with actual pathname of the damn file, quoted to reasonable
extent.

2) same, and skip the INDEX: <none> lines.  It's not as if they contained
any useful information - the size of table is printed right before that,
so you'd get

...
UserFiles:	16
    0: foo
   11: bar
UserBufs:	....

instead of

...
UserFiles:	16
    0: foo
    1: <none>
    2: <none>
    3: <none>
    4: <none>
    5: <none>
    6: <none>
    7: <none>
    8: <none>
    9: <none>
   10: <none>
   11:	bar
   12: <none>
   13: <none>
   14: <none>
   15: <none>
UserBufs:	....

IMO the former is more useful for any debugging purposes.

The patch is trivial either way - (1) is
------------------------
diff --git a/io_uring/fdinfo.c b/io_uring/fdinfo.c
index b214e5a407b5..1017249ae610 100644
--- a/io_uring/fdinfo.c
+++ b/io_uring/fdinfo.c
@@ -211,10 +211,12 @@ __cold void io_uring_show_fdinfo(struct seq_file *m, struct file *file)
 
 		if (ctx->file_table.data.nodes[i])
 			f = io_slot_file(ctx->file_table.data.nodes[i]);
+		seq_printf(m, "%5u: ", i);
 		if (f)
-			seq_printf(m, "%5u: %s\n", i, file_dentry(f)->d_iname);
+			seq_file_path(m, f, " \t\n\\<");
 		else
-			seq_printf(m, "%5u: <none>\n", i);
+			seq_puts(m, "<none>");
+		seq_puts(m, "\n");
 	}
 	seq_printf(m, "UserBufs:\t%u\n", ctx->buf_table.nr);
 	for (i = 0; has_lock && i < ctx->buf_table.nr; i++) {
------------------------
and (2) -
------------------------
diff --git a/io_uring/fdinfo.c b/io_uring/fdinfo.c
index b214e5a407b5..f60d0a9d505e 100644
--- a/io_uring/fdinfo.c
+++ b/io_uring/fdinfo.c
@@ -211,10 +211,11 @@ __cold void io_uring_show_fdinfo(struct seq_file *m, struct file *file)
 
 		if (ctx->file_table.data.nodes[i])
 			f = io_slot_file(ctx->file_table.data.nodes[i]);
-		if (f)
-			seq_printf(m, "%5u: %s\n", i, file_dentry(f)->d_iname);
-		else
-			seq_printf(m, "%5u: <none>\n", i);
+		if (f) {
+			seq_printf(m, "%5u: ", i);
+			seq_file_path(m, f, " \t\n\\");
+			seq_puts(m, "\n");
+		}
 	}
 	seq_printf(m, "UserBufs:\t%u\n", ctx->buf_table.nr);
 	for (i = 0; has_lock && i < ctx->buf_table.nr; i++) {
------------------------

Preferences?  The difference in seq_printf() argument is due to the need
to quote < in filenames if we need to distinguish them from <none>;
whitespace and \ needs to be quoted in either case.




[Index of Archives]     [Linux Samsung SoC]     [Linux Rockchip SoC]     [Linux Actions SoC]     [Linux for Synopsys ARC Processors]     [Linux NFS]     [Linux NILFS]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]


  Powered by Linux