Re: [PATCH] io_uring/io-wq: Use set_bit() and test_bit() at worker->flags

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Hello Jens,

On Fri, May 03, 2024 at 12:41:38PM -0600, Jens Axboe wrote:
> On 5/3/24 11:37 AM, Breno Leitao wrote:
> > @@ -631,7 +631,8 @@ static int io_wq_worker(void *data)
> >  	bool exit_mask = false, last_timeout = false;
> >  	char buf[TASK_COMM_LEN];
> >  
> > -	worker->flags |= (IO_WORKER_F_UP | IO_WORKER_F_RUNNING);
> > +	set_bit(IO_WORKER_F_UP, &worker->flags);
> > +	set_bit(IO_WORKER_F_RUNNING, &worker->flags);
> 
> You could probably just use WRITE_ONCE() here with the mask, as it's
> setup side.

Nice, I didn't know we could mix and match regular operations and
set_bits(). Digging a bit further, I got that this is possible.

Thanks for the feedback.




[Index of Archives]     [Linux Samsung SoC]     [Linux Rockchip SoC]     [Linux Actions SoC]     [Linux for Synopsys ARC Processors]     [Linux NFS]     [Linux NILFS]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]


  Powered by Linux