Re: [syzbot] [fs?] [io-uring?] general protection fault in __ep_remove

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 4/15/24 15:31, Jens Axboe wrote:
This isn't related to io_uring at all, not sure why syzbot has this idea
that anything that involves task_work is iouring.

The repro does send an IORING_OP_READ, but I haven't looked deeper
to say if it's anything meaningful.


#syz set subsystems: fs


--
Pavel Begunkov




[Index of Archives]     [Linux Samsung SoC]     [Linux Rockchip SoC]     [Linux Actions SoC]     [Linux for Synopsys ARC Processors]     [Linux NFS]     [Linux NILFS]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]


  Powered by Linux