Re: [syzbot] [fs?] [io-uring?] general protection fault in __ep_remove

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Subject: Re: [syzbot] [fs?] [io-uring?] general protection fault in __ep_remove
From: Jens Axboe <axboe@xxxxxxxxx>
Date: Mon, 15 Apr 2024 08:31:13 -0600
Cc: brauner@xxxxxxxxxx, io-uring@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, jack@xxxxxxx, linux-fsdevel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, linux-kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, syzkaller-bugs@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, viro@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
In-reply-to: <0000000000002d631f0615918f1e@google.com>
User-agent: Mozilla Thunderbird

This isn't related to io_uring at all, not sure why syzbot has this idea
that anything that involves task_work is iouring.

#syz set subsystems: fs

-- 
Jens Axboe

Follow-Ups:
- Re: [syzbot] [fs?] [io-uring?] general protection fault in __ep_remove
  - From: Pavel Begunkov

References:
- [syzbot] [fs?] [io-uring?] general protection fault in __ep_remove
  - From: syzbot

Prev by Date: Re: [PATCH 2/7] security: Remove the now superfluous sentinel element from ctl_table array
Next by Date: Re: [syzbot] [fs?] [io-uring?] general protection fault in __ep_remove
Previous by thread: [syzbot] [fs?] [io-uring?] general protection fault in __ep_remove
Next by thread: Re: [syzbot] [fs?] [io-uring?] general protection fault in __ep_remove
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

[Index of Archives] [Linux Samsung SoC] [Linux Rockchip SoC] [Linux Actions SoC] [Linux for Synopsys ARC Processors] [Linux NFS] [Linux NILFS] [Linux USB Devel] [Video for Linux] [Linux Audio Users] [Yosemite News] [Linux Kernel] [Linux SCSI]

Powered by Linux