Pavel Begunkov wrote: > We'll need to associate additional callbacks with ubuf_info, introduce > a structure holding ubuf_info callbacks. Apart from a more smarter > io_uring notification management introduced in next patches, it can be > used to generalise msg_zerocopy_put_abort() and also store > ->sg_from_iter, which is currently passed in struct msghdr. This adds an extra indirection for all other ubuf implementations. Can that be avoided?
