Re: [PATCHSET v4] Add io_uring futex/futexv support

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]



On Mon, Aug 07 2023 at 12:23, Jens Axboe wrote:
> On 8/6/23 7:23?PM, Thomas Gleixner wrote:
>> Go and look at the amount of fallout this has caused in the last years.
>> io-urine is definitely the leader of the pack in my security@xxxxxxxxxx
>> inbox.
> We're now resorting to name calling? Sorry, but I think that's pretty
> low and not very professional.

I'm not resorting to that. If you got offended by the meme which
happened to elapse into my reply, then I can definitely understand
that. That was not my intention at all. But you might think about why
that meme exists in the first place.

>> Vs. the problem at hand. I've failed to catch a major issue with futex
>> patches in the past and I'm not seeing any reason to rush any of this to
>> repeat the experience just because.
> I'm not asking anyone to rush anything.

 "As we're getting ever closer to the merge window, and I have other
  things sitting on top of the futex series, that's problematic for me."

That's your words and how should I pretty please interpret them



[Index of Archives]     [Linux Samsung SoC]     [Linux Rockchip SoC]     [Linux Actions SoC]     [Linux for Synopsys ARC Processors]     [Linux NFS]     [Linux NILFS]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]

  Powered by Linux