Re: [PATCH tools/io_uring] tools/io_uring: correctly set "ret" for sq_poll case

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 2/23/23 7:25 PM, Ziyang Zhang wrote:
> On 2023/2/23 11:46, Jens Axboe wrote:
>> On 2/21/23 12:37?AM, Ziyang Zhang wrote:
>>> For sq_poll case, "ret" is not initialized or cleared/set. In this way,
>>> output of this test program is incorrect and we can not even stop this
>>> program by pressing CTRL-C.
>>>
>>> Reset "ret" to zero in each submission/completion round, and assign
>>> "ret" to "this_reap".
>>
>> Can you check if this issue also exists in the fio copy of this, which
>> is t/io_uring.c in:
>>
>> git://git.kernel.dk/fio
>>
>> The copy in the kernel is pretty outdated at this point, and should
>> probably get removed. But if the bug is in the above main version, then
>> we should fix it there and then ponder if we want to remove the one in
>> the kernel or just get it updated to match the upstream version.
>>
> 
> Hi Jens,
> 
> I have checked t/io_uring.c and the code is correct with sq_poll.

OK good, I'll attempt a sync with the kernel copy...

-- 
Jens Axboe





[Index of Archives]     [Linux Samsung SoC]     [Linux Rockchip SoC]     [Linux Actions SoC]     [Linux for Synopsys ARC Processors]     [Linux NFS]     [Linux NILFS]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]


  Powered by Linux