On Friday, January 27, 2023 5:53:24 PM EST Paul Moore wrote: > On Fri, Jan 27, 2023 at 5:46 PM Jens Axboe <axboe@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > On 1/27/23 3:38 PM, Paul Moore wrote: > > > On Fri, Jan 27, 2023 at 2:43 PM Jens Axboe <axboe@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > >> On 1/27/23 12:42 PM, Paul Moore wrote: > > >>> On Fri, Jan 27, 2023 at 12:40 PM Jens Axboe <axboe@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > >>>> On 1/27/23 10:23 AM, Richard Guy Briggs wrote: > > >>>>> A couple of updates to the iouring ops audit bypass selections > > >>>>> suggested in consultation with Steve Grubb. > > >>>>> > > >>>>> Richard Guy Briggs (2): > > >>>>> io_uring,audit: audit IORING_OP_FADVISE but not IORING_OP_MADVISE > > >>>>> io_uring,audit: do not log IORING_OP_*GETXATTR > > >>>>> > > >>>>> io_uring/opdef.c | 4 +++- > > >>>>> 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-) > > >>>> > > >>>> Look fine to me - we should probably add stable to both of them, > > >>>> just to keep things consistent across releases. I can queue them up > > >>>> for 6.3. > > >>> > > >>> Please hold off until I've had a chance to look them over ... > > >> > > >> I haven't taken anything yet, for things like this I always let it > > >> simmer until people have had a chance to do so. > > > > > > Thanks. FWIW, that sounds very reasonable to me, but I've seen lots > > > of different behaviors across subsystems and wanted to make sure we > > > were on the same page. > > > > Sounds fair. BTW, can we stop CC'ing closed lists on patch > > submissions? Getting these: > > > > Your message to Linux-audit awaits moderator approval > > > > on every reply is really annoying. > > We kinda need audit related stuff on the linux-audit list, that's our > mailing list for audit stuff. > > However, I agree that it is crap that the linux-audit list is > moderated, but unfortunately that isn't something I control (I haven't > worked for RH in years, and even then the list owner was really weird > about managing the list). Occasionally I grumble about moving the > kernel audit development to a linux-audit list on vger but haven't > bothered yet, perhaps this is as good a reason as any. > > Richard, Steve - any chance of opening the linux-audit list? Unfortunately, it really has to be this way. I deleted 10 spam emails yesterday. It seems like some people subscribed to this list are compromised. Because everytime there is a legit email, it's followed in a few seconds by a spam email. Anyways, all legit email will be approved without needing to be subscribed. -Steve
