On 1/27/23 4:08 PM, Paul Moore wrote: > On Fri, Jan 27, 2023 at 6:02 PM Jens Axboe <axboe@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: >> On 1/27/23 3:53 PM, Paul Moore wrote: >>> On Fri, Jan 27, 2023 at 5:46 PM Jens Axboe <axboe@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: >>>> On 1/27/23 3:38 PM, Paul Moore wrote: >>>>> On Fri, Jan 27, 2023 at 2:43 PM Jens Axboe <axboe@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: >>>>>> On 1/27/23 12:42 PM, Paul Moore wrote: >>>>>>> On Fri, Jan 27, 2023 at 12:40 PM Jens Axboe <axboe@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: >>>>>>>> On 1/27/23 10:23 AM, Richard Guy Briggs wrote: >>>>>>>>> A couple of updates to the iouring ops audit bypass selections suggested in >>>>>>>>> consultation with Steve Grubb. >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> Richard Guy Briggs (2): >>>>>>>>> io_uring,audit: audit IORING_OP_FADVISE but not IORING_OP_MADVISE >>>>>>>>> io_uring,audit: do not log IORING_OP_*GETXATTR >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> io_uring/opdef.c | 4 +++- >>>>>>>>> 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-) >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Look fine to me - we should probably add stable to both of them, just >>>>>>>> to keep things consistent across releases. I can queue them up for 6.3. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Please hold off until I've had a chance to look them over ... >>>>>> >>>>>> I haven't taken anything yet, for things like this I always let it >>>>>> simmer until people have had a chance to do so. >>>>> >>>>> Thanks. FWIW, that sounds very reasonable to me, but I've seen lots >>>>> of different behaviors across subsystems and wanted to make sure we >>>>> were on the same page. >>>> >>>> Sounds fair. BTW, can we stop CC'ing closed lists on patch >>>> submissions? Getting these: >>>> >>>> Your message to Linux-audit awaits moderator approval >>>> >>>> on every reply is really annoying. >>> >>> We kinda need audit related stuff on the linux-audit list, that's our >>> mailing list for audit stuff. >> >> Sure, but then it should be open. Or do separate postings or something. >> CC'ing a closed list with open lists and sending email to people that >> are not on that closed list is bad form. > > Agree, that's why I said in my reply that it was crap that the > linux-audit list is moderated and asked Richard/Steve to open it up. And thanks for that, I just skipped it in the reply as it wasn't for me. -- Jens Axboe
