Re: [RFC v2 09/13] io_uring: separate wq for ring polling

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 1/2/23 8:04 PM, Pavel Begunkov wrote:
> Don't use ->cq_wait for ring polling but add a separate wait queue for
> it. We need it for following patches.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Pavel Begunkov <asml.silence@xxxxxxxxx>
> ---
>  include/linux/io_uring_types.h | 1 +
>  io_uring/io_uring.c            | 3 ++-
>  io_uring/io_uring.h            | 9 +++++++++
>  3 files changed, 12 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
> 
> diff --git a/include/linux/io_uring_types.h b/include/linux/io_uring_types.h
> index dcd8a563ab52..cbcd3aaddd9d 100644
> --- a/include/linux/io_uring_types.h
> +++ b/include/linux/io_uring_types.h
> @@ -286,6 +286,7 @@ struct io_ring_ctx {
>  		unsigned		cq_entries;
>  		struct io_ev_fd	__rcu	*io_ev_fd;
>  		struct wait_queue_head	cq_wait;
> +		struct wait_queue_head	poll_wq;
>  		unsigned		cq_extra;
>  	} ____cacheline_aligned_in_smp;
>  

Should we move poll_wq somewhere else, more out of the way? Would need to
gate the check a flag or something.

-- 
Jens Axboe





[Index of Archives]     [Linux Samsung SoC]     [Linux Rockchip SoC]     [Linux Actions SoC]     [Linux for Synopsys ARC Processors]     [Linux NFS]     [Linux NILFS]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]


  Powered by Linux